Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Alt's avatar

Thanks for these clarifications. My sense is the generally credulous and un-sceptical reporting is due to several factors. One is that there is so little hard data available (many publishers/studios are private, and do not release official stats) that there is an absolute hunger for any kind of metrics. And the other is that those covering anime tend to be those who stand to benefit from anime looking successful: fans, lay-journalists, industry insiders, "Cool Japan" bureaucrats, etc.

Expand full comment
Saurabh Belgaonkar's avatar

Hi. I think the Netflix top 10 underestimates the popularity of weekly anime because of how the stats are calculated. From what I understand formulae of views is = (total hrs watched in week)/(est hrs for series).

Assuming the extreme case where viewers are only watching the new episode, and unique viewers are constant as the number of episodes increases, the views will decrease as the estimated hrs for the series increases, while total hrs watched in constant.

That's why anime normally has a large viewership at the start, but gradually decreases. Even the first viewership stat we get is after 2 episodes, so if viewers are just watching the new episode that week, then the viewership is half.

Based on that, Sakamoto Days' first viewership data should have been around a max 16 million views instead of 8 million views that were given.

Correct me if you think I am wrong.

Expand full comment

No posts